@InProceedings{YunLiByWeOtGaMc:2023:QuErRe,
author = "Yun, Jeongmin and Liu, Junjie and Byrne, Brendan and Weir, Brad
and Ott, Lesley E. and Gatti, Luciana Vanni and McKain, Kathryn",
affiliation = "{California Institute of Technology} and {California Institute of
Technology} and {California Institute of Technology} and {NASA
Goddard Space Flight Center} and {NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{NOAA ESRL Global Monitoring Division}",
title = "Quantifying errors in regional terrestrial biosphere CO2 fluxes in
OCO-2 MIP models using aircraft measurements",
booktitle = "Proceedings...",
year = "2023",
organization = "AGU FAll Meeting",
publisher = "AGU",
abstract = "Multi-inverse modeling inter-comparison projects (MIPs) provide a
chance to assess the uncertainties in inversion estimates arising
from various sources such as atmospheric CO2 observations,
transport models, and prior fluxes. However, accurately
quantifying ensemble flux errors remains challenging, often
relying on the ensemble spread as a surrogate. This presentation
proposes an approach to quantify the errors of regional
terrestrial CO2 flux estimates from ten inverse models within the
Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 MIP by utilizing independent
aircraft CO2 measurements for the period 2015-2017. We first
calculate the root-mean-square error (RMSE) between the ensemble
mean of posterior CO2 concentrations and aircraft observations and
then isolates the CO2 concentration errors caused solely by
posterior CO2 fluxes by subtracting the errors of representation,
transport, and observation in seven regions. Our analysis reveals
significant regional variations in the average monthly RMSE over
three years, ranging from 0.90 to 2.04 ppm. Posterior flux error
is a major component that accounts for 57-83% of the mean RMSE. We
further show that in five regions, the true posterior flux errors
projected in CO2 space exceed the atmospheric CO2 errors resulted
from the ensemble spread of posterior CO2 flux estimates by
1.4-1.9 times, implying underestimation of the true posterior flux
errors, while their magnitudes are comparable in two regions. By
identifying most sensitive areas to aircraft measurements through
adjoint sensitivity analysis, we find that the underestimation of
terrestrial flux errors is prominent in eastern parts of Australia
and East Asia, western parts of Europe and Southeast Asia, and
midlatitude North America. However, no such underestimation is
observed in southern Alaska and northeastern South America,
suggesting the presence of systematic biases related to
anthropogenic CO2 emissions in inversion estimates. Our study
highlights the critical role of aircraft measurements not only for
qualitatively evaluating inversion performance but also for
quantifying regional errors in ensemble flux estimates.",
conference-location = "San Francisco, CA",
conference-year = "11-15 Dec. 2023",
language = "en",
urlaccessdate = "21 maio 2024"
}